For an alliance whose innovative methods are often held up as models for others to imitate, it is essential that GAVI evaluates "lessons learned". It does this through commissioned studies and is guided by its evaluation policy.
From new types of funding to ground-breaking partnerships, the GAVI Alliance has built a reputation for "thinking outside the box" in its efforts to deliver life-saving vaccines in the world’s poorest countries. Evaluation offers the Alliance the opportunity to measure what has worked and why.The GAVI Alliance commissioned evaluations of:
Here is the latest on these evaluations:
The evaluation report (PDF - 3MB) was completed, and after a review process by the GAVI Evaluation Steering Committee, was discussed by the GAVI Board in March 2009.
Here is the executive summary of the evaluation study (PDF - 120K) and the GAVI management response (PDF -60K).
Work is ongoing to implement the agreed recommendations and develop the further actions required.
Summary of results and findings
The evaluation report (PDF - 628K) was completed, and then went through a review process by the ISS Steering Committee (September 2007) and the GAVI Working Group (October 2007).
The GAVI Senior Management team prepared a formal response (Excel - 32K) to the recommendations for the GAVI Alliance Boards in November 2007. Work is ongoing to implement the agreed recommendations and develop the further actions required.
The objectives of the evaluation were to:
Read the report of the INS evaluation (PDF - 1.6MB)
The ADIPs evaluation study was completed, the report (PDF - 390K)endorsed by the board in May 2007 and a managerial response (PDF - 56K) given.
The GAVI Alliance evaluation policy (PDF - 57K) guides how GAVI accesses its activities from 2008 onwards (GAVI Phase Two).
The policy has been developed by the GAVI secretariat and the Monitoring and Evaluation Technical Advisory Group (METAG) and has been reviewed by the GAVI Working Group.
Criteria
As well as defining the objectives of GAVI evaluations in the context of the alliance’s overall mission, the policy also identifies which GAVI activities will be assessed; this list includes projects, programmes and policies.
Criteria for each evaluation include relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact – negative or positive – and sustainability.
The policy also helps the alliance consider when evaluations should be carried out and by whom: during a policy’s implementation or afterwards; by internal staff or outsourced; in a participatory manner or jointly among partners.
Knowledge-sharingThe policy also enables partners to carry out their own evaluations, emphasizing the importance of knowledge-sharing across the Alliance. It also outlines how external evaluators should be selected and gives guidance on conflict of interest and transparency issues.
All GAVI evaluations are carried out according to international standards, guaranteeing independence, impartiality and transparency.